Ed Marod Offers Legal Advice to Casey Anthony!

Should Casey Anthony buy a house in Florida?

Here is WPB attorney Ed Marod's free, unsolicited advice:

"Consider the amount of scrutiny she's getting, buying a house in Orlando is not the greatest idea for her to begin with," said Marod. "There are ways to get at, even a homestead. It's just that in the Supreme Court of Florida they're saying a homestead is a homestead. It may be a good idea for her to do that."

Ok, what exactly does this mean?

 

Is Ed saying she should buy a house here, or not, or just that she MAY buy a house but that the asset MAY or MAY NOT be protected?

I think what the bowtied one is saying is "sometimes a homestead really is just a homestead."

Are You Ready for the Casey Anthony Civil Suits?

I'm not, but they're coming anyway.

One interesting suit has been brought by a non-profit missing persons organization, Texas Equusearch, which works with law enforcement to help track down missing persons.

The suit seeks recovery of all the costs and expenses expended to help find Caylee back in 2008.

In related news, Casey plans to change her name and get plastic surgery.

Could Hollywood be far behind?

3d DCA Watch -- Order Has Been Restored Edition.

 It's that time of the week folks, so let's see what's a happenin, hotstuff, in the bunker of resplendently robed love:

Tire Kingdom v. Dishkin:

Judge Shepherd on class actions.

How do you think he ruled?

In other news, it was only a matter of time before the inevitable happened -- Kendall Coffey has an opinion on Casey Anthony.

See, everything is back to normal again.

Casey Anthony Judge Displays Powerful Listening Skills.

I'm not following the Casey Anthony trial and know absolutely nothing about the Orange County judge presiding over the case, the Honorable Belvin Perry Jr., though naturally lawyers who appear before him and are quoted by name don't have anything but nice things to say about him.

And it's a very high-profile case and tensions are running very high etc.

But still I'm just flabbergasted at this judge's inability to understand what defense counsel is complaining about here.

Defense lawyers feel free to weigh in, but the essential idea of burden of proof doesn't strike me as a difficult concept to grasp, whether you agree with defense counsel's request for a curative instruction or not.