AD (728x90)

Showing posts with label Judge Jose E. Martinez. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judge Jose E. Martinez. Show all posts

Wednesday, 10 August 2011

Bismarck's Descendant Met With Chilly Reception at Broward Federal Courthouse.




Can't Bismarck's descendant just keep filing lawsuits against David Rockefeller/President Obama/Al Sharpton/The Pointer Sisters without continually being hassled by The Man?

(For tonight's performance, the role of "The Man" is being played by kindly deputy USMs in the Broward federal courthouse.)

After having one complaint dismissed by Judge Zloch (and his motion for in forma pauperis denied) and another dismissed by Judge Martinez and then another by Judge Cooke (but his in forma pauperis motion was granted!), it seems our erstwhile Squinky, Blinky, and Mod Nazi spy/pro se plaintiff got into a little kerfuffle while one his way to filing yet another magnum opus up in Broward federal court.

Here's the best part:
It took five (5) DUSM's to finally control DELANEY and place him under arrest as he continued to kick and throw closed fist strikes at them.
Five deputy marshalls??

And it only took two of Obama's goons to jump the poor guy as he slept fitfully on an Hawaiian beach.

It's funny I happened to be in line at the courthouse just as all this unfolded, and managed to capture the entire encounter on my smartphone (see above).

Monday, 8 August 2011

Denzel Washington Now Offers PIP Coverage!



There's a lot a talk each legislative session about reforming Florida's PIP laws, but I say if blockbuster Hollywood legend Denzel Washington is now offering PIP coverage, we have to be doing something right:
That at all times, the Defendant Denzel Washington was in the State to provide business, including but not limited to personal injury protection (pip) coverage.
My suggestion to Ms. Miller is that she get a hold of one of Bismarck's relatives and really learn how to load up the allegations when she amends the complaint.

(You gotta pay attention to Iqbal, folks!)

Monday, 1 August 2011

Bismarck's Drafting Skills Could Use Some Work!



Oh the poor hapless descendant of Bismarck's pro se travails in federal court continue.

First, Erica Jung's (sic) loving son got no love from Judge Martinez, even though he specifically namechecked the Pointer Sisters.

Now Judge Cooke offers the royal plaintiff some brief-writing tips.

Admittedly, some of her suggestions in terms of structure and flow are quite technical:
The complaint barely articulates an intelligible sentence and certainly fails to assert a colorable claim for relief. The 12-page document is a rambling collection of quotes, references to historical landmarks, celebrities, movies, and obscure and apocalyptic bible references. Throughout the body of the complaint, Plaintiff has underlined selected words, in no discernable pattern, to reveal what he has identified to be a “coded message.” These “messages” are nothing more than a random collection of words arranged together in incoherent paragraphs.

Hey, this guy's stealing my act!

Friday, 1 July 2011

SHOCKER -- Section 1983 Does Not Protect Bismarck's Descendants!


 Pro se plaintiff Larry Delaney, the love child of Chancellor Bismarck and Erica Jung (I'm guessing he means fully liberated author Erica Jong), just can't catch a break.



Not only was he jumped -- at the personal direction of the President and Vice-President -- by a bunch of goons as he slept peacefully in his sleeping bag on a moonlit Hawaiian beach, but now Judge Martinez thinks his civil rights claims may be frivolous.

Damn you Al Sharpton:
Plaintiff does allege that he was “tied to the whipping post,” but he appears to be speaking figuratively, because he asserts this happened “in . . . coded case law.” Plaintiff also alleges that “President O’bama [sic]” and “Vice President Biden” arranged “to have the Petitioner jumped by two Hawaiians in his sleeping bag” and arranged “for a girl to poison the Petitioner at his apartment complex.” On their face, these allegations, particularly in conjunction with Plaintiff’s other allegations, appear fantastic and delusional. Even if the Court did not dismiss these allegations as frivolous on their face, the Court notes that they do not appear to assert that the President and Vice-President were acting under color of state law.
Oh I see, the old "frolic and detour" defense.

So the Prez and Veep were just having a good time on a Saturday night, I got you Judge M.

Pretty crafty I'll say that, but then again you are in fact dealing with British intelligence and/or the Pointer Sisters.

Will Otto and Erica's kid take this lying down (in his sleeping bag)?

Stay tuned.......

Wednesday, 29 June 2011

Bismarck's Descendant Is At It Again!



When last we checked in on everyone's favorite SD FL pro se litigant, the busy descendant of Bismarck and Erica Jung was before Judge Zloch articulating a conspiracy involving British intelligence, David Rockefeller, and three children codenamed by the Nazis as "Squirt, Stinky, and Spike."

Now Mr. Delaney is back with a fresh complaint before Judge Martinez, and he has expanded his blockbuster allegations to include Martin Luther King, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, President Obama, Pope John Paul, the entire Royal Family (not Pippa!) and of course the Pointer Sisters.

Read on and be amazed and/or stupefied, depending on just how much you trust Detective Kato of the Honolulu Police Department.......

Tuesday, 3 May 2011

Judge Brown Vindicated; Let's Have a Bench Trial!

Judge Brown Vindication

Peter Halmos' last-ditch toe-tapping effort to have Judge Brown's order of reference vacated has been denied by Judge Martinez.

In a comprehensive order, Judge Martinez addresses specifically the "coerced consent" issue, the "mediator then adjudicator" issue, and the SIMPLY AMAZING(!) "judicial rhetoric" issue.

Here's a taste from footnote one:
Before Judge Brown asked any either party about consent individually, however, counsel represented to Judge Brown that the parties had all agreed to consent.  Judge Brown asked the parties one at a time regarding consent only after counsel made that representation.  Plaintiff's motion omits any mention of this portion of the transcript.
Translation = I've got your back!

Now go have some fun spending endless days proving up damages to a leaky boat.

 

© 2013 FlatMag. All rights resevered. Share on Blogger Template Free Download